CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-03

Scalable Differentially Private Data Compression via Diffusion and Stochastic Codes

Gergely Flamich, Oykü Sıla Güner, Yanxiao Liu, Deniz Gündüz

The ever-increasing collection of personal data has created mounting pressure to develop technologies that protect sensitive aspects of individual identity. Differential privacy (DP) provides a principled framework with strong formal guarantees and has already achieved practical success. However, releasing high-dimensional data, such as images, has remained elusive: releasing uncompressed privatized data requires significant storage. At the same time, no effective data compression scheme exists that can compress high-resolution data with privacy guarantees. We address this challenge with DP-DiPP, a compression pipeline that combines stochastic codes with diffusion models. DP-DiPP is highly flexible: the practitioner has direct control over the compression rate-privacy-utility tradeoff. As the theoretical backbone, we extend the Poisson private representation (PPR) to encode the outputs of privacy mechanisms. We then combine it with DiffC, a diffusion-based lossy data compression method, to obtain a differentially private image compressor. Our experiments on privatized image classification on CIFAR-10 demonstrate that DP-DiPP significantly outperforms the baseline, achieving a 10-30 times better compression while retaining comparable privacy guarantees and utility.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data

Vinícius Gabriel Angelozzi, Héber H. Arcolezi

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination ag…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CR2026-07-06

Towards Personalized Differentially Private Learning for Decentralized Local Graphs

Longzhu He, Peng Tang, Chaozhuo Li, Jinhu Fu, Litian Zhang, Li Sun, et al.

Graph-structured data is increasingly generated and stored in decentralized environments, such as social platforms, mobile applications, and edge networks, where users maintain control over their local graph data. However, collecting and analyzing such decentralized graph data fo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DScs.CRcs.LG2026-07-01

The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Approximate Differentially Private Continual Counting

Konstantina Bairaktari, Kasper Green Larsen

Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length $n$, where each $1$ corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. The stand…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.CY2026-07-18

Privacy Cost as Equity Input: A Group Fairness Criterion for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Rakshit Naidu

Differential privacy (DP) is increasingly deployed to limit membership inference risk in machine-learning systems. Prior work has shown that DP-SGD can widen accuracy disparities across demographic groups, but this framing treats fairness as a purely outcome-side concern. We argu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-17

Code-Poisoning Property Inference Attacks

Xukun Luan, Yuhui Gong, Gang Zhang, Zixuan Huang, Yuanguo Bi, Xuesong Li, et al.

The flourishing code hosting platforms and coding agents enable even beginners with private data to build tailored Machine Learning (ML) models using available code quickly. The training data for ML models, often regarded as private property (e.g., clinical records, transaction i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

FedCVESA: Taking Away Training Data in Federated Learning via Correlation Value Encoding and Segmented Aggregation

Chongkai Li, Bang Zhang, Wenjian Luo

Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse…

View free PDFSource page