CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.HC2026-07-16

Divergent Gaze Patterns in Artistic Viewing: Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Attention Across Autistic Individuals, Artists, and Neurotypical Observers

Mohammed Amine Kerkouri, Daphné Senggaran, Renaud Jusiak, Océane Lehmann, Marouane Tliba, Claire Wardak, Emmanuelle Houy-Durand, Shasha Morel-Kohlmeyer, Aladine Chetouani, Nadia Aguillon-Hernandez

How different populations visually explore artworks bears on cognitive science and on accessibility design, yet most eye-tracking work in autism has used social scenes rather than art, and has analysed where the eyes land while ignoring when and in what order. We present a comparative free-viewing study across three groups, autistic adults (ASD), trained artists, and neurotypical observers, who each viewed 30 paintings for 15s. We introduce a directed, metric-grounded framework that compares groups along two complementary axes: a spatial axis, in which one group's fixation-density map predicts another's fixations under six saliency metrics (AUC-Judd, NSS, CC, SIM, KL, Information Gain); and a temporal axis, in which individual scanpaths are compared with MultiMatch, ScanMatch, a foveal-disc IoU score (FDISS), and dynamic time warping (DTW). Fixations are extracted uniformly for all groups with a dispersion-threshold algorithm. Three results converge. (i)Artists and neurotypicals are almost indistinguishable in both space (density-map correlation CC=0.96) and time (they form the most alignable scanpath pair), whereas ASD gaze diverges from both. (ii)ASD attention is dissociated: it matches artists' wide spatial exploration (dispersion, explored area) but carries a distinct temporal signature, shorter fixations, less dwell, and the most idiosyncratic (least self-consistent) scanpaths of any group. (iii)ASD gaze is not selectively artist-like on any metric; if anything it is marginally closer to neurotypical. Together these findings indicate that autistic viewing of art is a distinct, group-specific attentional profile in both space and time, and they motivate population-conditioned models of aesthetic attention. We release all analysis code and per-stimulus results.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.HCcs.LG2026-06-29

Consensus Clustering of Free-Viewing Gaze Data: New Insights into Human-Information Interaction

Beryl Gnanaraj, Jaya Sreevalsan-Nair, Saqib Alam Ansari, Maanasa Rajaraman

Free-viewing gaze data provides a rich, task-free window into human visual attention. Conventional exploratory data analysis of the data provides user attention patterns through fixations and areas of interest. However, despite the richness of this gaze data, its human-informatio…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.GRcs.HCcs.MM2026-06-26

STAG: Spatio-temporal Evolving Structural Representation of Action Units for Micro-expression Recognition

Nandani Sharma, Varun Sharma, Dinesh Singh

Micro-expression recognition is challenging due to subtle and short-lived facial muscle movements. Existing methods rely heavily on apex-onset frames, overlook fine-grained inter-frame dynamics, and separately model spatial and temporal information, limiting generalization across…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.HC2026-06-28

Attention Dynamics in Diffusion Models: A Visual Analytics Framework for Human-AI Collaboration

Yiran Xiao, George Legrady

Diffusion-based text-to-image models can synthesize complex and highly structured visual content, yet the emergence and evolution of semantic structure remain difficult to interpret. Many existing workflows rely on aggregated attention or scalar summaries that separate temporal c…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.HC2026-06-30

AA: A Multi-view Multimodal Dataset for Screen-based Gaze Estimation

Chang Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Zhoutong Ye, Xinjie Shen, Chun Yu, Yuanchun Shi

We present AA, a multi-view multimodal dataset for screen-based gaze estimation. The dataset captures synchronized facial observations from eight fixed screen-mounted cameras and two additional side-view cameras, paired with precise screen-space gaze targets collected under contr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-09

VEGAS: Human-Aligned Video Caption Evaluation via Gaze

Shenghui Chen, Po-han Li, Ximeng Sun, Shijia Yang, Emad Barsoum, Zicheng Liu, et al.

Vision-language models excel at video captioning, yet typically generate descriptions that fail to capture individual viewers' attention. We propose VEGAS (Video caption Evaluation via GAze Score), a training-free metric that leverages test-time gaze to sample personalized, atten…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.HC2026-07-17

Attention-Guided Saliency Maps for Interpreting Visualization Literacy in VLMs

Maeve Hutchinson, Abderrahmane Wassim Mehdaoui, Pranava Madhyastha

Understanding how vision-language models (VLMs) interpret data visualizations remains an open problem, and is increasingly important as these models are used for analytical tasks where reliable reasoning is essential. We introduce a lightweight, diagnostic saliency map method tai…

View free PDFSource page