CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-10

Central Tendency Bias in Human Selection of AI-Generated Design Variations

Huiyang Chen, Keqing Jiao

Image-generation AI systems increasingly support creative work by producing multiple design variations for users to evaluate and select. In such human-AI co-creation workflows, selection becomes a critical stage where human judgment guides AI-generated possibilities toward final outcomes. While presenting multiple alternatives is intended to encourage exploration, the simultaneous multi-option presentation may introduce systematic biases in human decision making. Drawing on ensemble perception theory, we investigate whether these interfaces induce central tendency bias-the tendency to favor options closer to the center of a design set. We conducted a controlled experiment manipulating the variance of design sets (high vs. low) and measured participants' selections in both aesthetic preference and representativeness tasks. Results show that higher variance increases the selection of center-proximal designs across both tasks. These findings suggest that multi-variation interfaces in image-generation AI systems may constrain selection diversity, revealing a potential tension between diversity in generated outputs and diversity in human selection outcomes.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.HC2026-07-03

AI Overviews in Academic Search: Evaluating AI-generated Summaries of Search Results in a Domain-specific Search Engine

Kevin Schott, Kanishka Silva, Ingo Frommholz, Philipp Mayr, Dagmar Kern, Daniel Hienert

Evaluating search engine results pages (SERPs) to assess result relevance is a demanding step in academic search. In a formative mixed-methods design study, we examine AI-generated SERP-level summaries as a support feature in an academic search engine for social science informati…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-04

CoGen3D: An Agentic Human-AI Co-Design Pipeline for 3D Asset Generation for Virtual Reality

Weiwei Jiang, Wanyu He, Zheyu Tan, Zheyuan Kuang, Difeng Yu, Shinobu Hasegawa, et al.

Creating 3D assets for virtual reality requires modeling expertise, which restricts the authorship of immersive experiences. Existing generative AI tools rely on unconstrained, command-driven prompting, lacking the conversational scaffolding needed for users to articulate their i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CY2026-06-26

Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images

Negar Kamali, Candice Rockell Gerstner, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh

Across social and online platforms, people are increasingly exposed to AI-generated images. As a consequence, the task of distinguishing AI-generated from authentic images is becoming a central challenge for information ecosystems. While humans perform better than chance, accurac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-06-30

Evaluating Interactivity: Toward Automated Assessment of AI-Generated Explorable Explanations

Xiaozao Wang, Zhewei Wang, Hongyi Wen

While large language models now enable rapid generation of interactive learning materials, evaluating the interaction quality of these explorable explanations remains an open challenge. Existing benchmarks largely focus on code executability or visual fidelity, providing limited…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-06-29

Ethics and Social Responsibility in AI-Assisted Interviewing: An LLM-in-the-Loop Study of AI-Generated Follow-Up Questions

He Zhang, Yueyan Liu, Xin Guan, Jie Cai, John M. Carroll

Semi-structured interviews rely on timely, context-sensitive follow-up questions, yet interviewers' cognitive load and limited domain familiarity can constrain probing depth. We report findings from an LLM-in-the-loop Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) study that simulates an AI follow-up assist…

View free PDFSource page