CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2023-06-06Cited by 0

A Mathematical Framework for Enriching Human–Machine Interactions

Andrée C. Ehresmann, Mathias Béjean, Jean-Paul Vanbremeersch

This paper presents a conceptual mathematical framework for developing rich human–machine interactions in order to improve decision-making in a social organisation, S. The idea is to model how S can create a “multi-level artificial cognitive system”, called a data analyser (DA), to collaborate with humans in collecting and learning how to analyse data, to anticipate situations, and to develop new responses, thus improving decision-making. In this model, the DA is “processed” to not only gather data and extend existing knowledge, but also to learn how to act autonomously with its own specific procedures or even to create new ones. An application is given in cases where such rich human–machine interactions are expected to allow the DA+S partnership to acquire deep anticipation capabilities for possible future changes, e.g., to prevent risks or seize opportunities. The way the social organization S operates over time, including the construction of DA, is described using the conceptual framework comprising “memory evolutive systems” (MES), a mathematical theoretical approach introduced by Ehresmann and Vanbremeersch for evolutionary multi-scale, multi-agent and multi-temporality systems. This leads to the definition of a “data analyser–MES”.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2023-10-18Cited by 10

FairCaipi: A Combination of Explanatory Interactive and Fair Machine Learning for Human and Machine Bias Reduction

Louisa Heidrich, Emanuel Slany, Stephan Scheele, Ute Schmid

The rise of machine-learning applications in domains with critical end-user impact has led to a growing concern about the fairness of learned models, with the goal of avoiding biases that negatively impact specific demographic groups. Most existing bias-mitigation strategies adap…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-01-26Cited by 4

Assessing Interaction Quality in Human–AI Dialogue: An Integrative Review and Multi-Layer Framework for Conversational Agents

Luca Marconi, Luca Longo, Federico Cabitza

Conversational agents are transforming digital interactions across various domains, including healthcare, education, and customer service, thanks to advances in large language models (LLMs). As these systems become more autonomous and ubiquitous, understanding what constitutes hi…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-07-22

Cognitive Friction in Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative Study of Judicial and Adjunct Human–AI Interaction Protocols

Samuele Pe, Laura Bergomi, Giovanna Nicora, Camilla A. Simonelli, Prabhjot Kour, Esperanza Diaz, et al.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support clinical decision making, yet concerns remain regarding algorithmic aversion, automation bias and the preservation of meaningful human oversight; while explainable AI aims to improve transparency, less attention has been dev…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-03-15

Painlevé Confluence and 1/f Phase-Locking Dynamics: A Topological Framework for Human–AI Collaboration

Michel Planat

Recent work on the evaluation of large language models emphasizes that the relevant unit of intelligence is not the artificial system alone but the human–AI hybrid. In parallel, topological and dynamical models of cognition based on Painlevé equations and non-semisimple topology…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-03-10Cited by 1

Co-Explainers: A Position on Interactive XAI for Human–AI Collaboration as a Harm-Mitigation Infrastructure

Francisco Herrera, Salvador García, María José del Jesus, Luciano Sánchez, Marcos López de Prado

Human–AI collaboration (HAIC) increasingly mediates high-risk decisions in public and private sectors, yet many documented AI harms arise not only from model error but from breakdowns in joint human–AI work: miscalibrated reliance, impaired contestability, misallocated agency, an…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-04-11

Algorithmic Insights into Human Irrationality: Machine Learning Approaches to Detecting Cognitive Biases and Motivated Reasoning

Sarthak Pattnaik, Chhayank Jain, Eugene Pinsky

This study illuminates fundamental questions in behavioral science through advanced machine learning methodologies applied to large-scale public opinion data. Drawing on Kahneman and Tversky’s dual-process theory and Sunstein’s nudge architecture, we employ hierarchical unsupervi…

View free PDFSource page