CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.CLstat.ML2026-07-10

Neural Collapse Is Forbidden: Information Floors in Language Models

Bruno Abrahao

Within-class variance in language-model representations is commonly read as incomplete neural collapse. We argue it is allocated information storage, and that the allocation obeys a law. A one-line centering identity voids a family of simplex equiangular-tight-frame claims, including our own earlier ones; in dimensionless variance shares across 14 models, macro-category structure carries only 4-12% of representational variance and within-token context carries 79-91%, stable across a 100x parameter range. On the theory side, token-level weight decay penalizes a category in proportion to its type count, not its occurrence mass, reducing next-token prediction to an imbalanced K-class problem whose optimum orders category norms by type count. A converse floor, proved for binary categories, forces within-category dispersion to be at least proportional to the conditional mutual information I(token; context | category). The law holds: identity dispersion, not total variance, tracks this information across every tested model and partition, under a model-free estimate and even across models, where one model's information predicts another's dispersion; and over pretraining the category share overshoots, decays, and partially recovers, because the information it must carry never left.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML2026-06-26

What LLMs explain is not what they believe: Evaluating explanation sufficiency under models' own input beliefs

Nhi Nguyen, Shauli Ravfogel, Rajesh Ranganath

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, where free-text explanations such as chain-of-thought and post-hoc rationales are used to justify model outputs. Yet it remains unclear whether these explanations are sufficient, i.e., if they contain…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML2026-06-30

GRPO, Dr. GRPO, and DAPO Are Three Operations on One Number: The Group-Standard-Deviation Identity

Yong Yi Bay, Kathleen A. Yearick

Three of the most popular methods for training language models to reason look like three different tricks. They are not. All three adjust a single number: standard deviation, reflecting how much a prompt's sampled answers disagree. When such a model is trained, it answers each pr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-05

Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition Probability

Christopher Nassif, Josh F. Cooper

Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge. While LLMs are trained to write like humans, we hypothesize that this training leaves an indelible mark. LLMs develop a particularly strong aversion to token repetit…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-15

Analogical Deep Research: Retrieving and Integrating Historical Analogies for Foresight Analysis

Yongqiang Chen, Guangyi Chen, Yuewen Sun, Kun Zhang

Systematic comparisons between current situations and structurally similar past events in the historical, i.e., historical analogies, is among the most powerful tools for foresight analysis. In this work, we present a new task called Analogical Deep Research (ADR) to Large Langua…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-05

CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in Games

Zhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu, Xiangchen Song, Zijian Li, et al.

Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capability of causal thinking, i.e., distinguishing causation from co…

View free PDFSource page