Technical Report on the CVPR 2026@AdvML Workshop Challenge

Tianyuan Zhang, Zonglei Jing, Jiangfan Liu, Ligong Zhang, Ke Ma, Chengzhi Sun, Xiaohai Xu, Zhirui Zhang, Qianqian Xu, Qingming Huang, Hanyu Fang, Junhua Liu, Zheng Wang, Xiaoliang Liu, Yuanbo Li, Shuai Gui, Bin Wang, Menghe Zheng, Jing Nie, Hanyang Meng, Zeyang Zhang, Xiang Zhang, Yongxuan Zhu, Rui Ding, Hainan Li, Yongkang Zhang, Zhilei Zhu, Xianglong Kong, Jin Hu, Zonghao Ying, Yisong Xiao, Lei Chen, Haotong Qin, Jiakai Wang, Aishan Liu, Ruikai Li, Julia Karbing, Yinpeng Dong, Zhenfei Yin, Shao Jing, Xia Hu, Jingyi Xu, Juntao Dai, Xinyun Chen, Vishal M. Patel, Xianglong Liu, Dawn Song, Alan Yuille, Philip H. S. Torr, Dacheng Tao

Vision-language agents (VLAs) are increasingly used to interpret complex driving scenes and support safety-critical reasoning. This report presents the CVPR 2026@AdvML Workshop Challenge on adversarial multimodal attacks against autonomous-driving VLAs. Built on DriveLM-style multi-view visual question answering, the challenge represents each scene with six synchronized camera images and a structured collection of driving-related question-answer pairs. Participants generate adversarial images and suffix-only textual perturbations that induce model responses to deviate from reference answers while preserving image fidelity and limiting textual cost. The competition comprises two phases, with Phase II adding a hidden black-box model to assess transferability. We describe the task design, submission rules, evaluation protocol, and leaderboard results, and then examine five leading submissions for which technical reports were available. Across these reports, several recurring patterns emerge: image-side attacks are favored by the suffix penalty; scene-level, multi-view optimization is more effective than treating views in isolation; QA types and graph structure provide useful priors for allocating attack budget; feature-space objectives can improve black-box transfer; and typographic content embedded in camera images exposes a persistent vulnerability in driving VLAs. These findings provide a practical reference for future robustness evaluation and defense design in multimodal autonomous-driving systems.