CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.CEcs.HC2026-07-14

Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science

Sutanay Choudhury, Jeffrey J. Czajka, Lummy M. O. Monteiro, Erin Bredeweg, Jason McDermott, Katherine Wolf, Alex Beliaev, Josh Elmore, Paul Piehowski, Kylee Tate, Yuqian Gao, Aivett Bilbao, Kelly Stratton, Scott Baker, Jaydeep P. Bardhan, Kristin Burnum Johnson, Chris Oehmen, Robert Rallo

Most AI-for-science systems focus on scaling a single reasoning process by using better models, larger context windows, long-horizon agentic execution, or digital co-scientists working with one principal user. However, challenging scientific problems are rarely solved by one reasoner alone. They are solved by teams whose members carry different priors, experimental background, tacit knowledge, and domain-trained intuitions. The open problem is therefore not only how to scale models, but how to develop "networked intelligence", scaling the connections between humans and AI systems so that a result or hypothesis produced in one context reaches another person, agent, instrument or robot that can act on it. We introduce Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents. As human users and agents work, the system captures important observations and hypotheses, tracks how they relate to the team's evolving knowledge model, and routes them to the person or agent whose next decision they can inform. We evaluate Mycelium through a real-world scientific discovery use case: a biological multi-omics campaign where shared context turned a local analytical finding into a cross-expert mechanistic constraint and ultimately into an experimental design. Finally, we describe networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts. This framework establishes when a scaled standalone agent is sufficient, and when isolated data and specialized expertise make a networked approach essential.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CY2026-06-28

LLMography: Transforming Human-AI Conversations into Traceability, Oversight, and Auditability Indicators

Mohammed Bousmah

The growing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education, software engineering, academic writing, and technical documentation raises a key question: how can we evaluate not only AI-assisted outputs, but also the interaction process that produced them? Current debates often fo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-02

What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?

Nathan Hughes, Ibrahim Habli

Human-AI teaming has received increasing attention in the literature. However, the range of studies conducted in multiple domains make it difficult to understand what types of teams are being studied, and in what ways are they similar/different from one another. In this study, we…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-08

Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination

Yi Yang, Siyuan Liu, Xin Gao, Huamu Sun, Chao Liu, Qing Zhou, et al.

Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents. As AI agents, including large language models (LLMs), become embedded in daily life, they incr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-04

CoGen3D: An Agentic Human-AI Co-Design Pipeline for 3D Asset Generation for Virtual Reality

Weiwei Jiang, Wanyu He, Zheyu Tan, Zheyuan Kuang, Difeng Yu, Shinobu Hasegawa, et al.

Creating 3D assets for virtual reality requires modeling expertise, which restricts the authorship of immersive experiences. Existing generative AI tools rely on unconstrained, command-driven prompting, lacking the conversational scaffolding needed for users to articulate their i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-13

TRAIL: A Platform for Configurable Human--AI Teaming Experiments

Mohammad Amin Samadi, Pedro Martins De Bastos, Jaeyoon Choi, Spencer JaQuay, Seehee Park, Nia Nixon

An AI teammate's design properties (personality, communication style, when it speaks) can shape a team's trust, coordination, and decisions. Studying this rigorously demands infrastructure no existing tool provides: reproducible configuration of an AI teammate embedded in instrum…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-08

Creativity from Friction: Human-AI Interaction for Exploratory Structural Design

Ricardo Maia Avelino, Rita Sevastjanova, Tom Van Mele, Philippe Block, Mennatallah El-Assady

AI agents that generate final answers based on user input often do not meet the needs of creative fields. Fields such as structural design and architecture need interactive systems that help users externalise and develop ideas, explore alternatives, and refine partial solutions.…

View free PDFSource page