CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-06

Safe Bayesian Optimization with Counterfactual Policies

Katherine Avery, Bruno Castro da Silva, David Jensen

In many decision-making settings, new interventions are acceptable only if they do not reduce outcomes below some established threshold. For example, in clinical medicine, new treatments are often acceptable only if they do not worsen outcomes relative to an established standard of care. Safe Bayesian optimization maximizes an objective subject to safety constraints. In the setting that we consider here, safety is defined relative to a known baseline policy whose outcomes are counterfactual and therefore unobserved. Thus, the counterfactual outcomes of the baseline policy must be estimated and those (uncertain) estimates must be used to safely optimize the objective. We address this estimation problem by using conformal prediction to construct valid uncertainty intervals for counterfactual baseline outcomes, and we show how these intervals can be integrated into safe Bayesian optimization to ensure that constraint violations occur at or below a user-specified rate. We also show how to adapt these conformal estimates to different kinds of covariate shift. We provide a safety proof, experimental evidence, and a sensitivity analysis.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-20

RRPO: Reference-Relative Policy Optimization with Stratified Conditional Rollouts

Yuxin Xiong, Xunyi Jiang, Rohan Surana, Xintong Li, Sheldon Yu, Nikki Lijing Kuang, et al.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown strong effectiveness in reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback, where sampled rollouts can be compared within a group using task-provided correctness signals. However, extending group-relative optimization beyond verifi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-08

Entropy Pacing Policy Optimization for Multi-Task Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Zetian Hu, Shunyu Liu, Junjie Zhang, Yongcheng Jing, Ting-En Lin, Yongbin Li, et al.

Recent breakthroughs of Reinforcement Learning (RL) have highlighted its potential for complex agentic Large Language Model (LLM) tasks. However, existing efforts largely focus on single-task settings, whereas real-world deployment necessitates a generalist agent capable of solvi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-11

Beyond Euclidean Clipping: Overcoming Exploration Collapse in LLM RL via Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization

Zhicheng Cai, Xinyuan Guo, Hanlin Wu, Mingxuan Wang, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. However, RL algorithms with PPO-Clip are inherently limited by exploration collapse. Subsequent works remain primarily heuristic and fail to identify the essential cause of PPO-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-03

ACPO: Adaptive Credit Policy Optimization via Fine-Grained Surrogate Entropy

Zijun Xie, Yuyang You, Yongzhi Li, Enlei Gong, Zeyu Chen, Quan Chen, et al.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has substantially improved the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but sparse outcome rewards still make token-level credit assignment difficult. Existing scalable RL methods typically assign trajectory-level rewards uniformly across tok…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.dis-nncs.AIcs.LGmath.OC2026-07-08

Bayesian Optimization of Genetic Algorithm Hyperparameters in a Multi-Fidelity Framework for Efficient Lattice Material Design

Sergei Zorkaltsev, Maciej Haranczyk, Christina Schenk

This study presents a multi-fidelity framework for the systematic optimization of genetic algorithm (GA) hyperparameters. The framework integrates three fidelity levels: high-fidelity Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) homogenization for validation, a medium-fidelity 3D convolutional n…

View free PDFSource page