CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

CRRL: A Causality-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous System Recovery

Safia Fatima, Kai Olav Ellefsen, Leon Moonen

Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) for recovery in autonomous systems lacks causal understanding and generalizes poorly to novel failure scenarios. RL policies often stall in failure states, spending up to 70% of an episode immobilized. Rule-based recovery alone is inadequate, and adding heuristic recovery to a pretrained PPO policy worsens rewards because policies cannot coordinate well with unanticipated interventions. The issue is not missing recovery mechanisms but a lack of policies trained to collaborate with them. We introduce CRRL, a causal-guided RL framework that trains policies to work effectively with rule-based recovery. The recovery detects stalled states and assists the agent. Causal relations from driving logs shape the training signal, teaching the policy to anticipate stalls and adjust actions in recovery contexts. The framework follows MAPE-K, with sensor collection, causal model construction, and hybrid RL policy training corresponding to Monitor, Analyze, and Plan/Execute, respectively. We evaluate CRRL through a four-condition ablation study across three driving scenarios, with 20 episodes per condition. We find that causal training significantly improves reward, distance, and velocity. Moreover, 9 of 20 roundabout episodes required zero recovery intervention, confirming navigation competence. These results show that causal-guided training produces effective RL policies that cooperate with rule-based safety components.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

Gimitest: A Comprehensive Tool for Testing Reinforcement Learning Policies

Dennis Gross, Quentin Mazouni, Helge Spieker, Arnaud Gotlieb

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies can be unsafe and vulnerable to attacks. Ensuring their reliability is often a pain point as existing automated testing methods target only selected environments, testing scenarios, and RL algorithms. To address this, we propose a comprehensiv…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter, Martin Tappler

Explainability remains a key issue in reinforcement learning (RL). Distilling an interpretable policy from an agent trained in a complex environment is particularly challenging when the action space is continuous. We introduce ORCAID, a novel method for extracting interpretable r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-04

Don't Blame the Large Language Model: How Agent Harness Evolution Shapes Coding Agent Quality

Oussama Ben Sghaier, Hao Li, Bram Adams, Ahmed E. Hassan

Coding agents, autonomous systems that use large language models (LLMs) to resolve software engineering tasks, rely on agent harness: a middleware layer in between a developer and a large language model that orchestrates system prompts, tool execution, context management, and ite…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-05

Auto: The AGI Compiler

Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber

Every LLM agent run re-derives its behavior token by token on a frontier model: brilliant, expensive, slow, and unbounded. We present Auto, a compiler that records live agent behavior, measures which parts are secretly deterministic, extracts them into verified programs or distil…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-08

Validate the Dream Before You Trust Its Verdict: Admissibility for World-Model Simulators

Christian Oefinger, Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Korbinian Moller, Mattia Piccinini, Johannes Betz

Across robotics, World Models (WMs) are increasingly used to evaluate action policies by simulating the consequences of actions in an imagined world, and returning a success or safety verdict. Yet a verdict is only as trustworthy as the WM that produced it, and the WM itself need…

View free PDFSource page