CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter, Martin Tappler

Explainability remains a key issue in reinforcement learning (RL). Distilling an interpretable policy from an agent trained in a complex environment is particularly challenging when the action space is continuous. We introduce ORCAID, a novel method for extracting interpretable rule-based policies from RL agents operating in mixed continuous-discrete environments with continuous action spaces. Our main contribution is an efficient oblique decision tree training algorithm that partitions the state space by hyperplanes and fits local linear models. The key idea lies in a three-stage split search: efficient random initialization, local refinement, and backward elimination. Finally, adjacent leaves are merged to yield a concise set of interpretable rules describing a given deep RL policy. We evaluate ORCAID across multiple RL environments, demonstrating that the extracted rule-based policies maintain strong performance with a low number of parameters and can even be used to improve the performance of the original deep RL policy.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

CRRL: A Causality-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous System Recovery

Safia Fatima, Kai Olav Ellefsen, Leon Moonen

Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) for recovery in autonomous systems lacks causal understanding and generalizes poorly to novel failure scenarios. RL policies often stall in failure states, spending up to 70% of an episode immobilized. Rule-based recovery alone is inadequat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

Gimitest: A Comprehensive Tool for Testing Reinforcement Learning Policies

Dennis Gross, Quentin Mazouni, Helge Spieker, Arnaud Gotlieb

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies can be unsafe and vulnerable to attacks. Ensuring their reliability is often a pain point as existing automated testing methods target only selected environments, testing scenarios, and RL algorithms. To address this, we propose a comprehensiv…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-08

Validate the Dream Before You Trust Its Verdict: Admissibility for World-Model Simulators

Christian Oefinger, Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Korbinian Moller, Mattia Piccinini, Johannes Betz

Across robotics, World Models (WMs) are increasingly used to evaluate action policies by simulating the consequences of actions in an imagined world, and returning a success or safety verdict. Yet a verdict is only as trustworthy as the WM that produced it, and the WM itself need…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG2026-07-19

Teach it to stop, not just to click

Barada Sahu, Shivesh Pandey

Agentic computer-use RL is reported in single runs, and those numbers mislead. Using verifier-guided repair of a 35B computer-use agent (CUA) across five oracle-graded environments, we show a repaired policy's success rate is dominated by upstream variance: a variance-components…

View free PDFSource page