CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

Gimitest: A Comprehensive Tool for Testing Reinforcement Learning Policies

Dennis Gross, Quentin Mazouni, Helge Spieker, Arnaud Gotlieb

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies can be unsafe and vulnerable to attacks. Ensuring their reliability is often a pain point as existing automated testing methods target only selected environments, testing scenarios, and RL algorithms. To address this, we propose a comprehensive framework for testing single- and multi-agent RL policies under varying conditions. Our implementation of this framework, Gimitest, is an open-source tool that supports various gym frameworks and allows for modifications of their integrated components. This article describes the framework and details Gimitest's functionality and architecture. It showcases its effectiveness in testing multiple RL policies in environments such as the official Farama Gymnasium and PettingZoo.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

CRRL: A Causality-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous System Recovery

Safia Fatima, Kai Olav Ellefsen, Leon Moonen

Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) for recovery in autonomous systems lacks causal understanding and generalizes poorly to novel failure scenarios. RL policies often stall in failure states, spending up to 70% of an episode immobilized. Rule-based recovery alone is inadequat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter, Martin Tappler

Explainability remains a key issue in reinforcement learning (RL). Distilling an interpretable policy from an agent trained in a complex environment is particularly challenging when the action space is continuous. We introduce ORCAID, a novel method for extracting interpretable r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-08

Validate the Dream Before You Trust Its Verdict: Admissibility for World-Model Simulators

Christian Oefinger, Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Korbinian Moller, Mattia Piccinini, Johannes Betz

Across robotics, World Models (WMs) are increasingly used to evaluate action policies by simulating the consequences of actions in an imagined world, and returning a success or safety verdict. Yet a verdict is only as trustworthy as the WM that produced it, and the WM itself need…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-14

Form, Not Content? A Preregistered, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Learned Error-Conditioned Self-Repair Through Prompts and Weights in Frozen Small Code Models

Mehmet Iscan

Frozen small code LLMs are deployed locally, yet the information guiding a retry after a failed attempt is still measured without placebo controls in the self-repair literature. We treat a failed program as a conjecture and an execution counterexample as an oracle-relative refuta…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CYcs.SE2026-07-14

Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs

Junyu Ren

Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions need not hold up under formal scrutiny. We present EG-VAR (Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning), a Lean 4-based tool-call…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

Which Algorithm Specification Formats Help Language Models Implement Machine Learning Algorithms?

Masahiro Kato, Taka Kato

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to implement algorithms from research manuscripts, but papers often leave implementation choices implicit. This study examines how the written format of an algorithm specification affects first-pass LLM implementation accuracy. W…

View free PDFSource page