CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-03

Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

Andreas Kouridakis, Dimitrios Patiniotis Spyropoulos, George Vouros

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback. Concurrently, it seeks to align decisions with human expectations, preferences, and needs while mitigating risks associated with AI non-determinism. However, humans frequently over- or under-rely on AI recommendations, and current AI systems remain poorly calibrated to human expectations. To address these challenges, we introduce a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework designed to augment human capabilities and align AI agents with human preferences and expectations. Specifically, this paper (a) formulates the collaborative decision-making task as a stochastic game between an AI agent and a human player, and (b) proposes the Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), which integrates human-calibrated models with reinforcement learning agents that leverage linguistic feedback in an iterative, reflective process. Evaluation results demonstrate that HCRA enhances decision-making effectiveness and delivers high-quality recommendations.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-22

Bayesian uncertainty estimation improves clinical decision making in medical AI agents

Frederik Hauke, Patrick Wienholt, Christiane Kuhl, Dyke Ferber, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, et al.

Machine learning models for medical image analysis typically lack a reliable measure of confidence, limiting their use in ambiguous or atypical cases. Here we show that Monte Carlo dropout, applied to a multi-task chest-radiograph classifier (eight thoracic findings, 137,593 trai…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIecon.GN2026-07-23

pAI-Econ-claude: A Gated Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Architecture for AI-Assisted Economic Theory Development

Chen Zhu, Xiaolu Wang, Weilong Zhang

In many social-science research tasks, such as economics, LLM-based agents must produce outputs for which no cheap, task-complete, machine-readable correctness signal exists. This creates a distinctive reliability problem for multi-agent systems: how should generation, critique,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-07

LLM-powered reasoning in agent-based modeling

Sifat Afroj Moon, Dakotah Maguire, Adam Spannaus, Joe Tuccillo, Maksudul Alam, Sudip K. Seal, et al.

Agent-based modeling (ABM) has the capability to model millions of individuals and their interactions, which is useful for policy making. However, ABMs have traditionally relied on static prior, which prevents the models from adapting to real-time changes. Our research provides a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-17

When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations

Jose Manuel de la Chica Rodriguez, Jairo Rodriguez Arias, Spyridon Chouliaras

Standard automation ROI misses four categories of systemic risk -- tacit knowledge erosion, resilience reduction, regulatory exposure, and socio-institutional capital degradation -- that affect long-term organizational performance. PHP-AIO (Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-O…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won

Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans. Today these plans are authored manually: engineers review hardware self-healing validation documents and bills of materi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-17

CoWeaver: A Bi-directional, Learnable and Explainable Matching Engine for Mixed Human-Agent Science Collaboration

Jiayao Gu, Kexin Chu, Peidong Liu, Yue Yang, Lynn Ai, Qi Zhang, et al.

LLM-based agents excel at writing articles, coding and information retrieval. However, they fail to form strong collaborations within the scientific community due to the bidirectional, dynamic nature of the problem and a high demand of decision interpretability. We proposed COWEA…

View free PDFSource page