CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-05

Do GUI Agents Believe Their Eyes? Diagnosing State-Belief Reliance on Pixels versus Structure

Guijia Zhang, Yuxun Chen, Yuheng Qi, Harry Yang

Multimodal GUI agents read an interface through two redundant channels: the rendered pixels of a screenshot and a serialized structure such as a document object model or accessibility tree. Before acting, an agent forms a belief about the current interface state, but existing benchmarks score task success, element grounding, or attack resistance and do not ask whether that belief is drawn from the pixels. We formalize visual state reliance, the attribution of a state belief to pixels, structure, or priors, and measure it with paired single-channel interventions over 735 probes spanning real web, mobile, and desktop interfaces, of which 225 are zero-edit divergences mined from live production websites, all scored by deterministic forced choice with no model judge. Our central metric is the Perception-Fusion Gap (PFG), the fraction of probes a model perceives correctly yet resolves toward structure under conflict; a stricter variant that re-verifies perception on a tight crop of the target region leaves the gap intact. Across models from four vendors, textual state beliefs defer to structure while image-only accuracy stays near ceiling, and on unedited stale snapshots from live pages the same models follow the outdated structure on up to 0.88 of probes. A white-box ablation traces the textual effect to a single copied structural value, and gradient attribution shows the visual evidence is processed yet overridden. In live multi-step environments, one mis-sourced belief at the first step compounds into task failure with a self-recovery rate of at most 0.03. Comparing four mitigations on identical probes, prompt-level cues fail at the action level, certificate checks buy safety with refusals, and a training-free consistency gate is alone in reducing both hijack and task error. Visual state reliance thus gives a measurable diagnostic of whether agent state beliefs are visually grounded.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-24

SM4RT: Learning Structured Motion Geometry for 4D Reconstruction

Shing Ho J. Lin, Wenzhao Zheng, Dong Zhuo, Yuqi Wu, Jie Zhou, Jiwen Lu

Geometry Foundation Models (GFMs) have substantially advanced monocular 3D reconstruction, yet extending this capability to 4D dynamic understanding remains a fundamental challenge. Most existing motion perception methods (e.g., sparse tracking, dense point-wise flow) treat motio…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-24Cited by 2

Explainable Reinforcement Learning for assisting Air Traffic Controllers

Anduel Mehmeti, Gabriella Gigante, Salvatore Venticinque

To effectively integrate AI into high-stakes, critical environments such as healthcare, autonomous driving, and aviation--and to advance toward higher levels of automation and seamless human-AI collaboration--building trust in AI-driven solutions is essential. Trust, in turn, is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcs.AInlin.CD2026-07-24

Multiplicity of Stable Attractors in Disordered Neural Models

Raffaele Marino, Roberto Livi, Antonio Politi

We show how large-deviation statistics allows one to obtain reliable estimates of the multiplicity of stable fixed-points in a model of neural ordinary differential equations previously employed in computational tasks. The result is obtained by developing a suitable perturbative…

View free PDFSource page