CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivstat.MEstat.ML2026-07-31

Bayesian fusion forests for heterogeneous treatment effects on survival from randomised and real-world data

Tijn Jacobs, Stéphanie L. van der Pas, Wessel N. van Wieringen

We develop the Bayesian fusion forest, a nonparametric framework to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects on survival outcomes by combining a randomised controlled trial and real-world data. The framework relaxes the unconfoundedness assumption on the real-world data by assuming instead that the treatment effect transports across the two sources. Our method opens up right- and interval-censored outcomes to data fusion. We model the survival time with an accelerated failure time decomposition into a shared baseline prognosis, a source-specific deviation, a treatment effect, and a confounding function. The confounding function absorbs the confounding bias in the real-world data. Each component receives a Bayesian tree ensemble prior. The shared baseline prognosis borrows strength across sources, while the deviation captures between-source heterogeneity. A hierarchical Dirichlet process mixture models the error distribution nonparametrically. A simulation study shows efficiency gains over a trial-only analysis across varying levels of confounding and between-source heterogeneity. We combine the ACTG 175 trial with the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study to estimate the effect of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV. The fusion identifies a benefit for nearly every patient whereas the trial alone is inconclusive.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MEstat.ML2026-06-27

Doubly cross-fit debiased machine learning of heterogeneous treatment effects under principal stratification

Jiaqi Tong, Fan Li

Principal stratification provides a foundational framework for causal inference with intermediate outcomes by defining causal effects within subpopulations, yet existing work has largely focused on average effects across strata rather than treatment effect heterogeneity within st…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-04

Significance-First Splitting: Aligning Treatment Heterogeneity Detection with Honest Estimation

Pantelis Z. Hadjipantelis, Weng Man Chiang, Karthik Nagesh

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (CATE) requires simultaneously detecting effect modification and quantifying estimation uncertainty. Existing tree-based methods make an uneasy trade-off: significance-based approaches (Radcliffe and Surry 2011) identify subgroup interac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEstat.COstat.ML2026-07-17

An Efficient Likelihood Ratio Test for Online Changepoint Detection in the Presence of Autocorrelation

Yuntang Fan, Paul Fearnhead, Idris A. Eckley, Gaetano Romano

Changepoint detection methods have seen considerable development in recent years, with online algorithms capable of identifying structural changes in streaming data in near real time. However, the majority of existing methods are designed under the assumption of IID observations,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.LGstat.ME2026-07-22

Data-Poisoning Audits for Causal Effect Estimation

Kwangho Kim

Observational causal analyses increasingly pool records across sites, vendors, and collection systems, creating vulnerability to append-only attacks in which plausible records are strategically selected to alter a reported treatment effect. We develop a data-poisoning audit for a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEstat.ML2026-07-06

Identification and Bounding of Central Moments of Causal Effects Using Marginal Moments Information

Naoya Hashimoto, Yuta Kawakami, Jin Tian

Evaluating the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome is a central objective in causal inference. While the average causal effect summarizes the mean impact of treatment, the central moments of the individual causal effect (ICE) characterize the shape of the ICE distribution,…

View free PDFSource page