CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcond-mat.dis-nncs.AIstat.ML2026-06-26

How Width and Data Shape Generalization Scaling Laws in Quadratic Neural Networks

Julius Girardin, Emanuele Troiani, Yizhou Xu, Vittorio Erba, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová

Understanding how performance scales jointly with model size and data is a central problem in modern machine learning. Existing theoretical works on scaling laws typically describe generalization as a function of data or compute, often in fixed-feature or infinite-width regimes and for online SGD. Here, we instead study how generalization scales with the number of trainable parameters and the number of samples in a feature-learning model. We analyze $\ell_2$-regularized empirical test error minimization in a quadratic two-layer network in a finite-sample setting with structured data. This setting allows for an explicit characterization of the generalization error as a function of the number of samples, model width, and regularization. Our results reveal a phase diagram with distinct scaling regimes as the number of parameters varies. In particular, the generalization error follows data-dependent power laws controlled by the spectral structure of the target. We further characterize the transitions between regimes, including the onset of interpolation, and their impact on generalization.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-29

A Stochastic--Geometric Theory of Scaling Laws in Grokking

Róisín Luo, Christian Gagné, Jonas Ngnawé, Ihsan Ullah, Karyn Morrissey

Delayed generalization (\ie~grokking) refers to the phenomenon in which a neural network fits its training data early in training but only begins to generalize after a prolonged delay, often through an abrupt transition. Despite extensive empirical study, its underlying mechanism…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AImath.OCstat.ML2026-07-23

A Defense of the Quadratic Model

Alexandru Meterez, Pranav Ajit Nair, Depen Morwani, Cengiz Pehlevan, Sham Kakade, Alex Damian

Due to the complexity of neural network loss landscapes, optimization theory is forced to rely on idealized models, and there is generally a tradeoff between how theoretically tractable the model is, and how accurately it describes the true optimization dynamics. In this work, we…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-07-23

Hilbert Operator for Progressive Encoding (HOPE): A Mathematical Framework for Deconstructing Learned Representations in Deep Networks

Hossein Mobahi, Peter L. Bartlett

Deep neural networks encode complex representations, but deconstructing this internal knowledge remains a challenge. Given the link between learning and compression, network compression offers a promising lens to analyze this knowledge. However, standard compression heuristics of…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcond-mat.softcs.AIphysics.data-anstat.ML2026-07-21

Deep learning-based prediction of time-resolved adhesive forces in viscoelastic Hertzian contacts

Ali Maghami, Merten Stender, Michele Ciavarella, Antonio Papangelo

Fast prediction of the response of adhesive soft viscoelastic contacts represents a current challenge in soft robotics and for gripping and manipulation tasks. Determining the complete time-resolved force trajectory requires full numerical simulations, whose computational cost is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LGmath.STstat.CO2026-06-27

Perspectives on Latent Factor Indeterminacy and its Implications for Data Representation

Carel F. W. Peeters

The common factor analytic model is related to Helmholtz and Boltzmann machines, can be conceived as a linear autoencoder, or can be thought of as a single-hidden-layer generative neural network. We thus consider it a basal generative representation learner that can be used as a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.ITstat.ML2026-07-06

What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn?

Rodrigo Casado Noguerales, Bernhard Schölkopf, Thomas Hofmann, Aran Raoufi

What does a discrete diffusion model learn: a denoiser, a score ratio, or a bridge plug-in predictor? At the level of jump rates, these are one object in different coordinates, and reading a neural network in the wrong coordinate changes the process being trained and sampled. Sta…

View free PDFSource page