CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivmath.STstat.MEstat.ML2026-07-03

Empirical Bayes for correlated Gaussian sequence model

Qiyang Han, Cun-Hui Zhang

Empirical Bayes methods are among the most widely used statistical methods for large-scale inference. A central paradigm is the NPMLE, whose theoretical guarantees are by now well understood for the independent Gaussian sequence model. In this paper, we study empirical Bayes estimation from dependent observations in the Gaussian sequence model. We show that the maximum Composite Marginal Likelihood (CML) estimator, which ignores all correlations in the likelihood, converges in weighted Hellinger distance at the rate $n_*^{-1/2}$, where $n_*=n/κ_0$ is the `effective sample size' determined solely by the number of observations $n$ and the spectral radius $κ_0$ of the correlation matrix of the Gaussian observations. A complementary minimax lower bound shows that $n_*$ indeed serves as the right complexity measure, and that the CML estimator is nearly rate optimal under general dependence. We consider two concrete applications. In the first, we consider Bayesian linear regression, where the signal prior is estimated via CML applied to the least squares estimator. In the second, we consider the more challenging Bayesian nonlinear single-index model, where prior is estimated by CML applied to a one-step debiased gradient descent. In both applications, although the full likelihood landscape can be arbitrarily complicated and intractable, our CML method is facilitated by exploiting the high-dimensional distribution of the auxiliary statistics through a correlated Gaussian sequence model. The key ingredient in the proof of our results is a sharp local maximal inequality for the log composite marginal likelihood process under dependent Gaussian observations. In contrast to standard empirical process methods, we prove this inequality by leveraging a recent geometric Brascamp-Lieb inequality for Gaussian measures.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.ME2026-07-02

Contaminated Multi-task Learning with Heterogeneity: Fundamental Limits and Optimal Algorithms

Ye Tian, Mengchu Li, Marco Avella Medina

Integrating information across related tasks can improve estimation and prediction in transfer, multi-task, and federated learning, but contamination and heterogeneity make robust borrowing challenging. We study a contaminated multi-task empirical risk minimization (ERM) framewor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.COstat.ME2026-07-10

Deep Gaussian Processes on Directed Acyclic Graphs

Federico L. Perlino, Oliver Hamelijnck, Adam M. Johansen, Theodoros Damoulas

Many real-world processes can be represented as compositions of functions along a directed acyclic graph (DAG). In causal modelling, these correspond to the underlying mechanisms; in engineering, to multiple fidelity levels; and in gene-regulatory networks, to transcription facto…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEmath.STstat.ML2026-07-19

The Resolution of Causal Heterogeneity

Yuki Ohnishi, Fan Li

Causal subgroup analyses often report a small number of groups summarizing treatment effect heterogeneity, as if that number were a well-defined estimand. Outside genuinely latent class populations, however, a ``true'' subgroup count is model dependent rather than a population fu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEmath.STstat.ML2026-07-02

Cross-Audit Projection for Model Risk Prediction

Yijian Huang

For training-data-based model risk prediction, $K$-fold cross-validation~(CV) is widely used to mitigate the well-known over-optimism of the empirical risk and is often regarded as reliable. However, for binary classification via empirical risk minimization, our numerical studies…

View free PDFSource page