CORTEXA
← Browse
arxiveess.SY2026-07-13

A Hierarchical Semi-Markov Load Model for AI Data Centers Coupling Job Scheduling with Bulk-Synchronous-Parallel Power Dynamics

Chandan Chaudhary, Atri Bera, Cody Newlun, Mohammed Ben-Idris, Joydeep Mitra

AI data centers are emerging as a dominant new load class with their power dynamics fundamentally from conventional industrial loads. Inside a training job, the bulk-synchronous-parallel algorithm moves each node through compute, sync, and checkpoint steps, which swings power between full load and near idle within seconds. Across the whole facility, jobs arrive, take blocks of nodes for hours to days, then leave, so the number of busy nodes changes daily, weekly, and yearly. This slower shift drives facility-wide swings and the peak demand that sets the size of the grid link. A model that looks only at within-job behavior, and treats the facility as a fixed set of busy nodes, smooths out these swings and misses the true peak-to-average ratio. This paper develops a hierarchical semi-Markov Data-Center (HSM-DC) load model that couples two layers across two timescales. A job-scheduling layer creates jobs through a non-homogeneous compound-Poisson process shaped by daily, weekly, and seasonal patterns, gives each job a heavy-tailed node count and length, and places jobs on a fixed pool of nodes on a first-come basis. A within-job layer moves each busy node through a five-state semi-Markov chain for the BSP steps, with state-based Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise. Facility power comes from this changing node count and the per-node power, set to match measured node data and the facility's straight-line power-versus-load curve. Configured to the reference facility at the same scale, the model matches mean power, its spread, and the peak-to-average ratio across load levels, with fit scores of 0.9997, 0.92, and 0.82. It also matches the share of queued jobs to within one point at high load. Facility-wide swings and peak demand come from how jobs arrive and get scheduled, so grid planning must model that process, not just scale up a single node's power curve.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxiveess.SYcs.DCnlin.AO2026-07-22

Do Co-Located AI Training Jobs Synchronize? Load-Dependent Throttling as a Coupling Mechanism for Phase-Locking Behind a Shared Power Cap

Brieuc Le Roux Tardif

Large-scale AI training turns computing facilities into multi-megawatt loads whose power draw is periodic: tens of thousands of accelerators step in lockstep between compute-bound phases near peak power and communication-bound phases where they idle. Prior work treats each facili…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SYcs.AI2026-07-03

Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Carbon-Aware AI Data Centers in Power Distribution Systems

Hyunsoo Lee, Panggah Prabawa, Dae-Hyun Choi, Joongheon Kim

Eco-friendly energy management for artificial intelligence data centers (AIDCs) is crucial because of the significant increase in energy consumption-induced carbon emissions from AIDCs resulting from the rapid expansion of AI applications. This paper proposes a hierarchical carbo…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-07-15

Assessing Risks of Hydro-Generator Shaft Fatigue from Data Center Load Oscillations

Kaustav Chatterjee, Meghana Ramesh, Shuchismita Biswas, Brett A. Ross, Antos C. Varghese, Sameer Nekkalapu, et al.

Large AI data center loads can introduce persistent sub-synchronous active-power oscillations that may impact nearby generators by exciting torsional modes and increasing shaft stress. This paper presents a model-based framework for evaluating hydro-generator shaft fatigue risk u…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SYcs.AI2026-07-19

A Phased Development Framework Enabling Islanded Operation of Sustainable AI Data Centers With Onsite Grid-Following and Grid-Forming Energy Architectures

Soham Ghosh, Nabil Mohammed, Mohammad Ashraf Hossain Sadi

As hyperscale and colocation AI data centers continue to expand, the electric grid is increasingly required to support large, concentrated loads, with individual facilities ranging from 500 MW to 2 GW. Current projections estimate that approximately 50 GW of AI data center capaci…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-06-30

Grid-Interactive Thermal Management of AI Data Centers via Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization

Jiachen Shen, Jian Shi, Yijie Yang, Chenye Wu, Dan Wang, Ju Bin Song, et al.

Thermal management in AI data centers is increasingly challenged by bursty workloads and uncertain heat generation. To prevent thermal violations, existing cooling strategies either enforce conservative, rigid bounds that severely limit grid responsiveness, or rely on forecast-dr…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-06-30

A Novel Method for Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Model Discovery in Power Systems: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework

Xinming Wang, Fan Tang, Yingli Wei, Yakun He, Zhe Liu, Ping Jiang, et al.

With large-scale integration of emerging power electronic devices represented by grid-forming inverters, power system dynamics increasingly exhibit strong nonlinearity, multi-timescale coupling, and black-box control logic. These features hinder conventional parameter identificat…

View free PDFSource page