CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-15

When T2I Synthetic Data Backfires: Amplified Privacy Risks in Real-Synthetic Mix Training

Na Li, Boyu Kuang, Hongsheng Hu, Liquan Chen, Hyoungshick Kim, Yansong Gao, Anmin Fu

To overcome data scarcity and privacy constraints in data collection, it has become standard practice across academia and industry to augment real training data with text-to-image (T2I)-generated synthetic data, a paradigm we term Real-Synthetic Mix-Training (RSMT). While substituting synthetic data for sensitive real samples is widely regarded as a means to mitigate privacy exposure of the substituted data, the risk to the remaining real samples that actively participate in training has remained largely unexamined. This work reveals, for the first time, that RSMT can substantially amplify privacy leakage of these real training samples. We establish a theoretical framework, RSMT Memorization Amplification, proving that incorporating synthetic data displaces real samples toward peripheral regions of the mixed feature space, in turn forcing the model to memorize them more aggressively. Guided by this foundation, we propose RSMixLeak to systematically assess this risk through membership inference attacks (MIAs). RSMixLeak comprises two variants depending on the adversary's capability. The non-adversarial variant audits a benign RSMT pipeline with an honest T2I provider, establishing a lower bound on the leakage induced by the intrinsic gap between real and T2I-generated data. The adversarial variant considers an adversary who controls the T2I model or contributes crafted data to the T2I provider, and deliberately enlarges this distributional gap on a target class via either high-level semantic attribute binding or imperceptible pixel-level coating, further amplifying leakage on real training data while improving downstream model utility. Motivated by these findings, we further propose a lightweight leakage propensity indicator computable from real data alone that reliably identifies high-risk datasets unsuitable for entering RSMT, as a self-assessable mitigation.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-01

Forensic-Oriented Intrusion Detection Using Synthetic Network Traffic Data and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Jose Luis Vela Alonso, Carmen Pellicer

Digital forensic investigations of network intrusions require analytical outputs that are traceable, reproducible, and court-defensible - requirements existing machine learning pipelines do not satisfy, since they treat original evidence as training data and produce opaque classi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

FedCVESA: Taking Away Training Data in Federated Learning via Correlation Value Encoding and Segmented Aggregation

Chongkai Li, Bang Zhang, Wenjian Luo

Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data

Vinícius Gabriel Angelozzi, Héber H. Arcolezi

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination ag…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CR2026-07-21

End-to-End Differential Privacy in Training Deep Neural Network Classifiers

Huaiyuan Rao, Calvin Hawkins, Alexander Benvenuti, Matthew Hale

Differentially private machine learning enables model training on sensitive data while ensuring that individual data is unlikely to be recoverable from the parameters of the resulting model. However, existing work often privatizes both training inputs and their labels, and these…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-15

Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning in Radiology Reports: A Comparative Evaluation of Tokenizer-Driven Privacy Risks

Santhosh Parampottupadam, Andres Martinez, Dimitrios Bounias, Sinem Sav, Klaus Maier-Hein, Ralf Floca

Federated learning (FL) enables multi-institutional training on clinical text without sharing raw data, but gradient inversion can reconstruct sensitive information from shared model updates. The extent of this leakage for radiology reports, and the role of tokenizer design, rema…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.CY2026-07-07

Recovering Clinical Utility Under Differential Privacy: Empirical Validation of Adaptive Federated Aggregation on Heterogeneous Cardiovascular Datasets

Rodrigo Tertulino, Laercio Alencar, Ricardo Almeida

Validating federated learning frameworks on real clinical data is an essential step between proof-of-concept demonstrations in controlled synthetic environments and deployment in real multicenter healthcare settings. A prior architectural study by the same authors (Tertulino and…

View free PDFSource page