CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

The State-Prediction Separation Hypothesis

Giovanni Monea, Nathan Godey, Kianté Brantley, Yoav Artzi

Transformers use the same forward computation stream to both predict the next token and store useful state for future token predictions. We formulate the \emph{state-prediction separation hypothesis}: disentangling the two roles yields better language modeling performance. We design a Transformer variant that uses two computation streams to separate the two functions, and conduct pretraining experiments across various scales. Our experiments show that state-prediction separation consistently offers better data and compute efficiencies, improving validation loss and outperforming standard Transformers by 2--3 percentage points on average on downstream tasks. We also conduct extensive empirical analysis that rules out potential confounders and demonstrates the fundamental difference in the gradients our design entails.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV2026-07-05

DynaVieW: Schema-Guided World Modeling for Understanding Hierarchical Visual Dynamics

Silin Gao, Hao Zhao, Zeming Chen, Sepideh Mamooler, Antara Raaghavi Bhattacharya, Qiyu Wu, et al.

Multimodal LLMs struggle to systematically model the temporal evolution of visual scenes in videos or multi-image sequences. Such inputs require models to predict or simulate multiple levels of dynamic constituents, such as actions taken in the visual sequence, and the associated…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.DB2026-07-22

Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

Yurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang, et al.

Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning. While state-of-the-art reasoning models show great promise in predicting missing values in tables, by reasoning holistically across rows and columns, they are costly to deploy at scale and t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML2026-06-26

What LLMs explain is not what they believe: Evaluating explanation sufficiency under models' own input beliefs

Nhi Nguyen, Shauli Ravfogel, Rajesh Ranganath

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, where free-text explanations such as chain-of-thought and post-hoc rationales are used to justify model outputs. Yet it remains unclear whether these explanations are sufficient, i.e., if they contain…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG2026-06-26

Cognitive Episodes in LLM Reasoning Traces Enable Interpretable Human Item Difficulty Prediction

Chenguang Wang, Ming Li, Xinyue Zeng, Zhuochun Li, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou, et al.

Predicting human item difficulty is central to educational assessment, where reliable estimates support fairness and effective test construction. Existing methods often depend on costly human calibration or item-level textual representations, providing limited evidence about the…

View free PDFSource page