CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.PFcs.AIcs.AR2026-06-26

KernelSight-LM: A Kernel-Level LLM Inference Simulator

Xiteng Yao, Taeho Kim, Hengzhi Pei, Xinle Liu, Kyle Ulrich, Leonard Lausen, Ashish Khetan, Xiang Song, George Karypis, Martin Herbordt

As large language models (LLMs) move into production serving, practitioners must rapidly evaluate inference performance across diverse hardware, models, and serving parameters to meet cost and latency targets. However, the end-to-end behavior of LLMs couples serving-layer policies with low-level GPU kernel execution and rapidly evolving architectures, forcing slow, deployment-specific benchmarking that is hard to generalize. We present KernelSight-LM, a fine-grained inference simulator that models token-level execution and produces kernel-level latency breakdowns. It decomposes each serving step into a roofline kernel model with a learned efficiency term, a communication model, and a host-overhead model, composed through a discrete-event scheduler that also captures mechanisms like prefix caching and continuous batching. KernelSight-LM offers two prediction tiers that trade target-GPU data for accuracy. The cross-generation tier uses no target-GPU measurements, only hardware specifications and kernel microbenchmarks from previously profiled GPUs, and predicts per-kernel latency on an unseen GPU generation to 12.1% error, a 1.8x improvement over the roofline baseline (22.0%). A second target-measured tier adds one model-agnostic kernel-microbenchmark sweep on the target GPU, sharpening per-kernel error to 3.8%, a 7.3x improvement over a comparable baseline (27.7%). Both tiers require far less target-GPU data than the prior systems they extend. In our simulator, these predictions yield end-to-end median (p50) errors across six model families of 15.4%, 12.8%, and 3.0% (TTFT, TPOT, throughput) in the cross-generation tier and 14.3%, 6.2%, and 2.7% in the target-measured tier, matching dedicated profiling tools while collecting far less on-device data. Beyond prediction, its kernel-level bottleneck breakdowns support hardware/software co-design and capacity planning.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-24

SM4RT: Learning Structured Motion Geometry for 4D Reconstruction

Shing Ho J. Lin, Wenzhao Zheng, Dong Zhuo, Yuqi Wu, Jie Zhou, Jiwen Lu

Geometry Foundation Models (GFMs) have substantially advanced monocular 3D reconstruction, yet extending this capability to 4D dynamic understanding remains a fundamental challenge. Most existing motion perception methods (e.g., sparse tracking, dense point-wise flow) treat motio…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-24Cited by 2

Explainable Reinforcement Learning for assisting Air Traffic Controllers

Anduel Mehmeti, Gabriella Gigante, Salvatore Venticinque

To effectively integrate AI into high-stakes, critical environments such as healthcare, autonomous driving, and aviation--and to advance toward higher levels of automation and seamless human-AI collaboration--building trust in AI-driven solutions is essential. Trust, in turn, is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcs.AInlin.CD2026-07-24

Multiplicity of Stable Attractors in Disordered Neural Models

Raffaele Marino, Roberto Livi, Antonio Politi

We show how large-deviation statistics allows one to obtain reliable estimates of the multiplicity of stable fixed-points in a model of neural ordinary differential equations previously employed in computational tasks. The result is obtained by developing a suitable perturbative…

View free PDFSource page