CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-01-15Cited by 2

AI-Powered Vulnerability Detection and Patch Management in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Challenges, and Emerging Trends

Malek Malkawi, Reda Alhajj

With the increasing complexity of cyber threats and the inefficiency of traditional vulnerability management, artificial intelligence has been increasingly integrated into cybersecurity. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of AI-powered strategies including machine learning, deep learning, and large language models for identifying cybersecurity vulnerabilities and supporting automated patching. In this review, we conducted a synthesis and appraisal of 29 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2024. Our results indicate that AI methods substantially improve the precision of detection, scalability, and response speed compared with human-driven and rule-based approaches. We detail the transition from conventional ML categorization to using deep learning for source code analysis and dynamic network detection. Moreover, we identify advanced mitigation strategies such as AI-powered prioritization, neuro-symbolic AI, deep reinforcement learning and the generative abilities of LLMs which are used for automated patch suggestions. To strengthen methodological rigor, this review followed a registered protocol and PRISMA-based study selection, and it reports reproducible database searches (exact queries and search dates) and transparent screening decisions. We additionally assessed the quality and risk of bias of included studies using criteria tailored to AI-driven vulnerability research (dataset transparency, leakage control, evaluation rigor, reproducibility, and external validation), and we used these quality results to contextualize the synthesis. Our critical evaluation indicates that this area remains at an early stage and is characterized by significant gaps. The absence of standard benchmarks, limited generalizability of the models to various domains, and lack of adversarial testing are the obstacles that prevent adoption of these methods in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, the research suggests that the black-box nature of most models poses a serious problem in terms of trust. Thus, XAI is quite pertinent in this context. This paper serves as a thorough guide for the evolution of AI-driven vulnerability management and indicates that next-generation AI systems should not only be more accurate but also transparent, robust, and generalizable.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2025-05-22

Revolutionizing Cardiac Risk Assessment: AI-Powered Patient Segmentation Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

Joan D. Gonzalez-Franco, Alejandro Galaviz-Mosqueda, Salvador Villarreal-Reyes, Jose E. Lozano-Rizk, Raul Rivera-Rodriguez, Jose E. Gonzalez-Trejo, et al.

Cardiovascular diseases stand as the leading cause of mortality worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for effective tools that enable early detection and monitoring of at-risk patients. This study combines Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques—specifically the k-means cluster…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2025-09-21Cited by 41

Customer Churn Prediction: A Systematic Review of Recent Advances, Trends, and Challenges in Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Mehdi Imani, Majid Joudaki, Ali Beikmohammadi, Hamid Arabnia

Background: Customer churn significantly impacts business revenues. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods are increasingly adopted to predict churn, yet a systematic synthesis of recent advancements is lacking. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates ML and DL…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2026-07-02

From Explainable AI to Knowledge Extraction for Trustworthy Energy Forecasting Systems: A Systematic Review

Irina F. Iumanova, Pavel V. Matrenin, Alexandra I. Khalyasmaa

Modern artificial intelligence methods are increasingly used in power systems for renewable energy generation and electricity load forecasting. However, the limited interpretability of complex machine learning and deep learning models constrains their adoption in critical energy…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2025-12-27Cited by 1

Deep Learning Algorithms for Defect Detection on Electronic Assemblies: A Systematic Literature Review

Bernardo Montoya Magaña, Óscar Hernández-Uribe, Leonor Adriana Cárdenas-Robledo, Jose Antonio Cantoral-Ceballos

The electronic manufacturing industry is relying on automatic and rapid defect inspection of printed circuit boards (PCBs). Two main challenges hinder the accuracy and real-time defect detection: the growing density of electronic component placement and their size reduction, comp…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2024-02-21Cited by 117

Alzheimer’s Disease Detection Using Deep Learning on Neuroimaging: A Systematic Review

Mohammed G. Alsubaie, Suhuai Luo, Kamran Shaukat

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a pressing global issue, demanding effective diagnostic approaches. This systematic review surveys the recent literature (2018 onwards) to illuminate the current landscape of AD detection via deep learning. Focusing on neuroimaging, this study explores…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefMachine Learning and Knowledge Extraction2025-11-25Cited by 6

A Four-Dimensional Analysis of Explainable AI in Energy Forecasting: A Domain-Specific Systematic Review

Vahid Arabzadeh, Raphael Frank

Despite the growing use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in energy time-series forecasting, a systematic evaluation of explanation quality remains limited. This systematic review analyzes 50 peer-reviewed studies (2020–2025) applying XAI to load, price, or renewable g…

View free PDFSource page