CORTEXA
← Browse
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23Cited by 0

SO WHAT? GENERATIVE AI AND THE HISTORICAL REDEFINITION OF COGNITIVE COMPETENCE

Julio Cesar de Aguiar

Generative AI has entered intellectual practice with a quality best described as irresistible. Much of the intellectual response in research and education has been organized around an alarm: that these systems induce a surrender of thinking, an atrophy of cognitive capacity, an accumulation of cognitive debt. This essay argues that the alarm conflates two claims that must be told apart. The first is categorical — that generative AI corrupts a cognitive interior whose integrity consists in operating unaided. Its governing metaphors, debt and atrophy and renunciation, presuppose a prior solvent interior against which the deficit is scored, and no such interior is to be found at any documented moment of the historical record: the Greek transition from orality to literacy shows a comparable cognitive figure lost without loss of the human. The second claim is empirical and concerns the ecology in which competences are formed. It survives the separation, and the essay relocates rather than refutes it. Drawing on Latour’s argument that we have never been modern, and on convergent descriptions of cognition as coupled practice (Hutchins, Stiegler, Malafouris, Barad, Goody, Ong, Yuk Hui), the essay reconstructs cognition as a configuration of brains, bodies, tools, environments, and other people — a configuration whose history has repeatedly redefined what counts as cognitive competence. Recent measures of cognitive loss under generative AI assess competences with the ruler of the configuration those competences are leaving behind. What survives the critique is a systemic question, left open here: whether the emerging configuration sustains the practice it draws upon or depletes it. The burden of showing that it does not falls on those who raise the alarm. Concerns that are political-economic, environmental, labor-related, and about opacity and cultural standardization survive examination and deserve deliberation. The categorical alarm about cognition does not.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Art as an Algorithmic Virus: Unifying the Generative Crash and AI Value Convergence via Cognitive Affordances

Abraham Haskins

Generative AI inherently triggers a computational failure mode in human observers (a "generative crash") due to a lack of latent intentionality required for Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) convergence. Artistic appreciation operates as the biological execution of this IRL pr…

Also available via: European Organization for Nuclear Research

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

Simulating the Past: The Impact of Generative AI Chatbots on Secondary Students' Historical Empathy and Inquiry-Based Learning in Sabah

Lee Bih Ni

This study examined the impact of generative AI chatbots on secondary school students' historical empathy and inquiry-based learning in Sabah, Malaysia. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the intervention integrated AI-driven simulations into history classrooms to allow stude…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23

Large language models as interactive cognitive agents: Cognitive surrender, augmentation, and psychopathology

Rajith Ravindren, Midhun Sidharthan

Generative AI technologies are increasingly acquiring characteristics of interactive cognitive agents. These systems have considerable potential to augment learning and creativity, but they also pose novel challenges to the human mind. Continuous reliance on generative AI may res…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-24

Cognitive Cyborgification: A Bloom-Based Framework for Measuring the Externalization of Human Cognition to AI

K. Yamada

The externalization of cognitive abilities to tools is not new. Writing externalized memory; calculators externalized computation; search engines externalized knowledge retrieval. Each generation lost the skills its predecessors possessed, naturalized its tools, and claimed autho…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

The Value of Data in the Pre-AI Era | 前AI时代的数据价值

WU, JEFFI CHAO HUI

《前AI时代的数据价值》简介 本文作者巫朝晖(Jeffi Chao Hui Wu)基于跨越四十年的个人实证记录与多领域系统构建实践,系统性地提出了“前AI时代数据”这一核心学术概念,并将其严格界定为:2022年底生成式人工智能(Generative AI)以低成本、高仿真度大规模介入公共互联网内容生产之前,由真实人类大脑、真实的物理环境与真实的社会交互所产出的原始数字记录。作者认为,在当今海量AI生成文本、影像与逻辑推演泛滥的“数字噪音膨胀”时代,此类数据正从传统档案升格为兼具唯一性与不可复制性的稀缺基础资源,其价值遵循严格的“数据年龄”准则——即形成时…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23

A Minimum/Maximum Reading of Six Publishers' Generative-AI Disclosure Requirements: A Companion Dataset

K. Yamada

This dataset records, for six major academic publishers, whether an author must disclose the use of a generative-AI tool for each of six manuscript-preparation tasks. Each answer is taken directly from the publisher’s own public author guidance, quoted at the end of this document…

View free PDFSource page