CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-01

Learning Generalizable Skill Policy with Data-Efficient Unsupervised RL

Jongchan Park, Seungjun Oh, Seungho Baek, Yusung Kim

Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning (URL) aims to pre-train scalable, skill-conditioned policies without extrinsic rewards, serving as a foundation for downstream control tasks. Despite recent progress, we argue that current off-policy URL methods are limited by two critical, overlooked bottlenecks: (1) non-stationary skill semantics and (2) brittle generalization. To address these challenges, we propose GenDa (Generalizable Data-efficient Agent), a unified framework for robust unsupervised reinforcement learning. First, we introduce a skill relabeling mechanism to mitigate non-stationarity and significantly improve data efficiency for pre-training. Second, we propose a Complementary Information Bottleneck (CIB), encouraging the learned skill policy to focus on ego-centric features and become robust to distribution shifts for downstream tasks. Through various experiments, we demonstrate that GenDa significantly enhances the scalability of URL with superior generalizability and data efficiency. Our code and videos are available at https://ihatebroccoli.github.io/official-GenDa.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-15

Data-Efficient Adaptation of LLMs via Attention Head Reweighting

Tuomas Oikarinen, Zixiao Chen, Charlotte Siska, Tsui-Wei Weng, Chandan Singh, Jianfeng Gao

Learning effectively from limited data is critical in domains like security where labeled examples are scarce. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated some capabilities for data-efficient learning, especially through parameter-efficient adaptation methods, but continue to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CV2026-07-06

Leveraging Offline Supervision for Efficient and Generalizable Reinforcement Learning in Large-Scale Vision-Language-Action Models

Dmitriy Poyarkov, Aleksei Staroverov, Aleksandr I. Panov

It is commonly observed that online reinforcement learning (RL) produces better-performing strategies than offline methods across a broad range of performance measures. In particular, RL-trained policies exhibit stronger out-of-distribution (OOD) behavior, where models trained on…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-06

A Few Teacher Steps Go a Long Way: Cost-Efficient On-Policy Data Augmentation for Agent Post-Training

Junze Ye, Jiayi Cheng, Miao Lu, Michal Mankowski, Jose Blanchet, Mohsen Bayati

For LLM agents, supervised fine-tuning is not only about teacher labels' quality, but also about which interaction contexts those labels condition on. Pure behavioral cloning uses full teacher demonstrations, creating a mismatch between teacher-induced contexts seen in training a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-11

ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples

Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu, Shuo Yang, Chiyu Ma, Jiancan Wu, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet the training process remains notoriously fragile. In this work, we investigate a critical source of this instability: over-optimization, where models exploit tra…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

Gimitest: A Comprehensive Tool for Testing Reinforcement Learning Policies

Dennis Gross, Quentin Mazouni, Helge Spieker, Arnaud Gotlieb

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies can be unsafe and vulnerable to attacks. Ensuring their reliability is often a pain point as existing automated testing methods target only selected environments, testing scenarios, and RL algorithms. To address this, we propose a comprehensiv…

View free PDFSource page