CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.RO2026-06-25

Automating Potential-based Reward Shaping with Vision Language Model Guidance

Henrik Müller, Daniel Kudenko

Sparse rewards are inherently challenging for reinforcement learning agents as they lack intermediate feedback to guide exploration and to correctly attribute the sparse success rewards to relevant parts of the trajectory. Naive reward shaping can induce reward hacking, yielding policies that exploit auxiliary signals instead of solving the intended task. Potential-based reward shaping (PBRS) guarantees preservation of the optimal policy set, but requires the definition of a heuristic potential function over the state space. In this work, we introduce the VLM-guided PBRS framework VLM-PBRS that learns the potential function directly from vision language model (VLM) feedback. We query a lightweight VLM to obtain preferences over image pairs and train a model of the potential function using these preferences. As this approach is based on potential-based reward shaping, it preserves the original optimal policies, and removes the need for expert-designed reward shaping terms. Because large VLMs are prohibitively expensive to invoke repeatedly during policy learning, we employ smaller, more computationally efficient VLMs. Although the resulting preference labels are less accurate, empirical evidence shows that the preference labels can still be used to accelerate learning. We validate our method empirically in the Meta-World and Franka Kitchen environments and highlight the connection between VLM preference label accuracy and sample efficiency improvements. Our contributions are threefold: (1) the first application of VLM preference-based learning to synthesize a potential function for PBRS, (2) a principled, low-cost solution that leverages small VLMs, and (3) extensive empirical demonstration of improved sample efficiency and robustness to reward hacking.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-07

Vision Language Action (VLA) Models for Unmanned Aerial Robotics and Bimanual Manipulation: A Review

Inkyu Sa, Chanoh Park, Hea-Min Lee, Donghee Noh, Ho Seok Ahn

Vision Language Action (VLA) models unify visual perception, natural-language understanding, and action generation within a single foundation model, allowing a robot to follow instructions such as fold the towel or fly to the red building directly from camera images. Because VLAs…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-06

From Fixed to Free Cameras: Calibration-Free View-Robust Vision-Language-Action Model

Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Shijian Lu, Gongjie Zhang, et al.

Real-world robot deployment rarely maintains the training-stage camera setup, where cameras often experience repositioning or remounting depending on actual scenarios. Existing view-robust Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies tolerate such camera variations only when the camera…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.ETcs.LG2026-07-20

COLIP-2: Olfaction-Vision-Language Embeddings

Kordel Kade France

The Contrastive Olfaction-Language-Image Pre-training 2 (COLIP-2) model is a multimodal embeddings space that places olfaction as a first-class citizen among vision and language. Molecular structure, gas-sensor readings, odor-descriptor language, and images are all trained into a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-09

APIVOT: Adaptive Planning with Interleaved Vision-Language Thoughts

Emily Jin, Joy Hsu, Yiqing Xu, Weiyu Liu, Nick Haber, Jiajun Wu

Long-horizon robot planning requires jointly reasoning over semantic task structure and geometric feasibility. To successfully execute a task, a robot must decompose goals, select task-relevant objects, and sequence actions, while ensuring that plans satisfy spatial constraints s…

View free PDFSource page