CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems remains largely opaque, due to the complexity of traffic scenes. We propose a counterfactual ablation framework called Counterfactual Vision Action Analysis (CVAA) that systematically removes individual detected objects from front-camera images using photorealistic generative inpainting to prepare counterfactual sets to evaluate the difference in the model's response. This isolates the causal effect of each object's presence on the model's planning behaviour. Applied to the Alpamayo 1 trajectory predictor across 210 nuScenes driving scenes, we create a dataset Counter -nuScenes, using which we see that vehicles and pedestrians within the model's 'path' dominate causal influence as expected, while traffic lights, as expected, exert disproportionate effect relative to their image footprint. However, we also find cases where the model responds strongly to objects a human driver would consider irrelevant. This brings forth a deeper question: does the model itself view the scene as a sum of individual objects influencing the outcome, or does it encode an entirely different set of internal features that do not correspond to human-legible scene elements? To further understand this, we compare intermediate representations of original and inpainted image pairs using mechanistic interpretability techniques and examine the effect of the removal through the various model layers. Together, these two stages offer a path from behavioral auditing to representational understanding, creating explainable driving systems and solidifying human-AI trust.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-06

From Fixed to Free Cameras: Calibration-Free View-Robust Vision-Language-Action Model

Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Shijian Lu, Gongjie Zhang, et al.

Real-world robot deployment rarely maintains the training-stage camera setup, where cameras often experience repositioning or remounting depending on actual scenarios. Existing view-robust Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies tolerate such camera variations only when the camera…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-12

Action Map Policy: Learning 3D Closed-loop Manipulation via Pixel Classification

Haojie Huang, Zhang Ye, Linfeng Zhao, Boce Hu, Mingxi Jia, Yu Qi, et al.

The action space poses a major challenge in robot learning, since it is often high-dimensional, can span long time horizons, and frequently admits multi-modal optimal solutions. A good choice of action representation and loss function can help to address these concerns, but there…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-09

APIVOT: Adaptive Planning with Interleaved Vision-Language Thoughts

Emily Jin, Joy Hsu, Yiqing Xu, Weiyu Liu, Nick Haber, Jiajun Wu

Long-horizon robot planning requires jointly reasoning over semantic task structure and geometric feasibility. To successfully execute a task, a robot must decompose goals, select task-relevant objects, and sequence actions, while ensuring that plans satisfy spatial constraints s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-02

PhysMani: Physics-principled 3D World Model for Dynamic Object Manipulation

Peng Yun, Shouwang Huang, Hao Li, Jinxi Li, Jianan Wang, Bo Yang

Manipulating fast and dynamically moving targets in unstructured 3D environments remains challenging for embodied AI. Existing visual-language-action models and world models struggle with accurate 3D geometry and physically meaningful forecasting. We propose PhysMani, a framework…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CVcs.RO2026-06-26

LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior

Qinhong Zhou, Chuang Gan, Anoop Cherian

Embodied agents operating in decentralized and partially observable environments have attracted growing attention in recent years. However, existing large language model (LLM)-based agents often exhibit behaviors that are misaligned with their partners or inconsistent with the en…

View free PDFSource page